Abstract

We consider the optimal dividend problem under a habit-formation constraint that prevents the dividend rate from falling below a certain proportion of its historical maximum, a so-called drawdown constraint. Our problem is an extension of Duesenberry's optimal-consumption problem under a ratcheting constraint, studied by Dybvig [Rev. Econ. Stud., 62 (1995), pp. 287--313], in which consumption is restrained to be nondecreasing. Our problem also differs from Dybvig's in that the time of ruin could be finite in our setting, whereas ruin is impossible in Dybvig's work. We formulate our problem as a stochastic control problem with the objective of maximizing the expected discounted utility of the dividend stream until bankruptcy, in which risk preferences are embodied by power utility. We write the corresponding Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman variational inequality as a nonlinear, free-boundary problem and solve it semiexplicitly via the Legendre transform. The optimal (excess) dividend rate $c^*_t$---as a function of the company's current surplus $X_t$ and its historical running maximum of the (excess) dividend rate $z_t$---is as follows: There are constants $0 < {w_\alpha} < w_1 < w^*$ such that (1) for $0 < {\rm X}_t \le {w_\alpha} z_t$, it is optimal to pay dividends at the lowest rate $\alpha z_t$, (2) for ${w_\alpha} z_t < {X}_t < w_1 z_t$, it is optimal to distribute dividends at an intermediate rate $c^*_t \in (\alpha z_t, z_t)$, (3) for $w_1 z_t < {X}_t < w^* z_t$, it is optimal to distribute dividends at the historical peak rate $z_t$, (4) for ${\rm X}_t > w^* z_t$, it is optimal to increase the dividend rate above $z_t$, and (5) it is optimal to increase $z_t$ via singular control as needed to keep ${X}_t \le w^* z_t$. Because, the maximum (excess) dividend rate will eventually be proportional to the running maximum of the surplus, “mountains will have to move” before we increase the dividend rate beyond its historical maximum.

Keywords

  1. optimal dividend
  2. drawdown constraint
  3. ratcheting
  4. stochastic control
  5. optimal control
  6. variational inequality
  7. free-boundary problem

MSC codes

  1. 93E20
  2. 91G10
  3. 91G50

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
H. Albrecher, N. Bäuerle, and M. Bladt (2018), Dividends: From Refracting to Ratcheting, Working paper, University of Lausanne.
2.
T. Arun (2012), The Merton Problem with a Drawdown Constraint on Consumption, Working paper, University of Cambridge, arXiv:1210.5205.
3.
S. Asmussen, B. Højgaard, and M. Taksar (2000), Optimal risk control and dividend distribution policies. example of excess-of-loss reinsurance for an insurance corporation, Finance Stoch., 4, pp. 299--324.
4.
S. Asmussen and M. Taksar (1997), Controlled diffusion models for optimal dividend pay-out, Insurance: Math. Econom., 20, pp. 1--15.
5.
B. Avanzi (2009), Strategies for dividend distribution: A review, North American Actuar. J., 13, pp. 217--251.
6.
G. M. Constantinides (1990), Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle, J. Political Econom., 98, pp. 519--543.
7.
M. Crandall, H. Ishii, and P.-L. Lions (1992), User's guide to viscosity solutions of second-order partial differential equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 27, pp. 1--67.
8.
J. Cvitanić and I. Karatzas (1994), On portfolio optimization under “drawdown” constraints, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 65, pp. 77--88.
9.
B. De Finetti (1957), Su un'Impostazione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio, in Transactions of the 15th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 2, pp. 433--443.
10.
A. K. Dixit (1991), A simplified treatment of the theory of optimal regulation of Brownian motion, J. Econom. Dynam. Control, 15, pp. 657--673.
11.
B. Dumas (1991), Super contact and related optimality conditions, J. Econom. Dynam. Control, 15, pp. 675--685.
12.
P. H. Dybvig (1995), Dusenberry's racheting of consumption: Optimal dynamic consumption and investment given intolerance for any decline in standard of living, Rev. Econ. Stud., 62, pp. 287--313.
13.
R. Elie and N. Touzi (2008), Optimal lifetime consumption and investment under a drawdown constraint, Finance Stoch., 12, pp. 299--330.
14.
H. U. Gerber and E. S. W. Shiu (2004), Optimal dividends: Analysis with Brownian motion, North American Actuar. J., 8, pp. 1--20.
15.
H. U. Gerber and E. S. W. Shiu (2006), On optimal dividends: From reflection to refraction, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 186, pp. 4--22.
16.
S. J. Grossman and Z. Zhou (1993), Optimal investment strategies for controlling drawdowns, Math. Finance, 3, pp. 241--276.
17.
R. C. Merton (1969), Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case, Rev. Econ. Statist., 51, pp. 247--257.
18.
P. E. Protter (2005), Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, Stoch. Model. Appl. Probab. 21, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
Pages: 547 - 577
ISSN (online): 1945-497X

History

Submitted: 20 June 2018
Accepted: 22 March 2019
Published online: 21 May 2019

Keywords

  1. optimal dividend
  2. drawdown constraint
  3. ratcheting
  4. stochastic control
  5. optimal control
  6. variational inequality
  7. free-boundary problem

MSC codes

  1. 93E20
  2. 91G10
  3. 91G50

Authors

Affiliations

Funding Information

Cecil J. and Ethel M. Nesbitt Professorship
Susan M. Smith Professorship
National Science Foundation https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001 : DMS-1613170

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media