Sharing Profits in the Sharing Economy
Abstract
A monopolist platform (the principal) shares profits with a population of affiliates (the agents), heterogeneous in skill, by offering them a common nonlinear contract contingent on individual revenue. The principal cannot discriminate across individual skill but knows its distribution and aims at maximizing profits. This paper identifies the optimal contract, its implied profits, and agents' effort as the unique solution to an equation depending on skill distribution and agents' costs of effort. If skill is Pareto-distributed and agents' costs include linear and power components, then closed-form solutions highlight two regimes: If linear costs are low, the principal's share of revenues is insensitive to skill distribution and decreases as agents' costs increase. If linear costs are high, then the principal's share is insensitive to the agents' costs and increases as inequality in skill increases.
1. , An adverse selection approach to power pricing , SIAM J. Control Optim. , 58 ( 2020 ), pp. 686 -- 713 , https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1260578.
2. , The investment banking contract for new issues under asymmetric information: Delegation and the incentive problem , J. Finance , 35 ( 1980 ), pp. 1115 -- 1138 .
3. P. Bolton and M. Dewatripont, Contract Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
4. , Statistics and social network of YouTube videos, in Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Quality of Service, IEEE , Washington, DC , 2008 , pp. 229 -- 238 .
5. J. Cvitanic and J. Hugonnier, Optimal Fund Menus, CEPR Discussion Paper DP13127, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK, 2018.
6. J. Cvitanic and J. Zhang, Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models, Springer, Berlin, 2013.
7. , Moral hazard and adverse selection: The question of financial structure , J. Finance , 41 ( 1986 ), pp. 501 -- 513 .
8. , The case for a progressive tax: From basic research to policy recommendations , J. Econom. Perspectives , 25 ( 2011 ), pp. 165 -- 190 .
9. O. El Euch, T. Mastrolia, M. Rosenbaum, and N. Touzi, Optimal Make-Take Fees for Market Making Regulation, Tech. report, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3174933.
10. , A tale of a principal and many, many agents , Math. Oper. Res. , 44 ( 2019 ), pp. 377 -- 766 , https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2018.0931.
11. , New dynamic public finance: A user's guide, in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006, NBER Macroenonomics Annual 21, MIT Press, Cambridge , MA , 2007 , pp. 317 -- 388 .
12. R. A. Gordon, The Integrals of Lebesgue, Denjoy, Perron, and Henstock, Grad. Stud. Math. 4, AMS, Providence, RI, 1994.
13. . Laffont, A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm , J. Public Econom. , 25 ( 1984 ), pp. 329 -- 369 .
14. , Participation constraints in adverse selection models , J. Econom. Theory , 93 ( 2000 ), pp. 1 -- 47 .
15. , Countervailing incentives in agency problems , J. Econom. Theory , 49 ( 1989 ), pp. 294 -- 313 .
16. . Rochet, Bunching and second-order conditions: A note on optimal tax theory , J. Econom. Theory , 31 ( 1983 ), pp. 392 -- 400 .
17. , On countervailing incentives , J. Econom. Theory , 66 ( 1995 ), pp. 238 -- 263 .
18. , Optimal taxation in theory and practice , J. Econom. Perspectives , 23 ( 2009 ), pp. 147 -- 174 .
19. , An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation , Rev. Econom. Stud. , 38 ( 1971 ), pp. 175 -- 208 .
20. , Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates , Rev. Econom. Stud. , 68 ( 2001 ), pp. 205 -- 229 .
21. , Bunching properties of optimal nonlinear income taxes , Soc. Choice Welf. , 3 ( 1986 ), pp. 213 -- 232 .
