Abstract

Exponential family random graph models (ERGMs) are widely used to model networks by parameterizing graph probability in terms of a set of user-selected sufficient statistics. Equivalently, ERGMs can be viewed as expressing a probability distribution on graphs arising from the action of competing social forces that make ties more or less likely, depending on the state of the rest of the graph. Such forces often lead to a complex pattern of dependence among edges, with non-trivial large-scale structures emerging from relatively simple local mechanisms. While this provides a powerful tool for probing macro-micro connections, much remains to be understood about how local forces shape global outcomes. One very simple question of this type is that of the conditions needed for social forces to stabilize a particular structure: that is, given a specific structure and a set of alternatives (e.g., arising from small perturbations), under what conditions will said structure remain more probable than the alternatives? We refer to this property as local stability and seek a general means of identifying the set of parameters under which a target graph is locally stable with respect to a set of alternatives. Here, we provide a complete characterization of the region of the parameter space inducing local stability, showing it to be the interior of a convex cone whose faces can be derived from the change scores of the sufficient statistics vis-à-vis the alternative structures. As we show, local stability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for more general notions of stability, the latter of which can be explored more efficiently by using the “stable cone” within the parameter space as a starting point. In addition to facilitating the understanding of model behavior, we show how local stability can be used to determine whether a fitted model implies that an observed structure would be expected to arise primarily from the action of social forces, versus by merit of the model permitting a large number of high probability structures, of which the observed structure is one (i.e., entropic effects). We also use our approach to identify the dyads within a given structure that are the least stable, and hence predicted to have the highest probability of changing under the current social forces. The utility of the “stable cone” for ERGM parameter optimization is then demonstrated on a physical model of amyloid fibril formation. This demonstration features a visualization of the stable region, whereby it is shown that the majority of the region of the model's parameter space where ERGM simulations produce the highest fibril yield lies within the “stable cone.”

Keywords

  1. graph theory
  2. mathematical modeling of graphs
  3. network data
  4. social network analysis
  5. computational sociology
  6. computational biophysics
  7. network Hamiltonian

MSC codes

  1. 05Cxx
  2. 05C62
  3. 68R10
  4. 91D30

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
D. Acemoglu, A. Ozdaglar, and A. Tahbaz-Salehi, Systemic risk and stability in financial networks, American Economic Review, 105 (2015), pp. 564--608.
2.
N. Alon, R. Yuster, and U. Zwick, Finding and counting given length cycles, Algorithmica, 17 (1997), pp. 209--223.
3.
D. Avis and K. Fukuda, A pivoting algorithm for convex hulls and vertex enumeration of arrangements and polyhedra, Discrete Comput. Geom., 8 (1992), pp. 295--313.
4.
C. B. Barber, D. P. Dobkin, D. P. Dobkin, and H. Huhdanpaa, The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 22 (1996), pp. 469--483.
5.
S. A. Boorman, A combinatorial optimization model for transmission of job information through contact networks, Bell J. Economics, 6 (1975), pp. 216--249.
6.
D. S. Callaway, M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts, Network robustness and fragility: Percolation on random graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (2000), 5468.
7.
S. Chatterjee and P. Diaconis, Estimating and understanding exponential random graph models, Ann. Statist., 41 (2013), pp. 2428--2461.
8.
R. Cowan and N. Jonard, Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge, J. Econom. Dynami. Control, 28 (2004), pp. 1557--1575.
9.
W. Davis, Heaven's Gate: A study of religious obedience, Nova Religio, 3 (2000), pp. 241--267.
10.
P. Sheridan Dodds, D. J. Watts, and C. F. Sabel, Information exchange and the robustness of organizational networks, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 100 (2003), pp. 12516--12521.
11.
O. Frank and D. Strauss, Markov graphs, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 81 (1986), pp. 832--842.
12.
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman, Community structure in social and biological networks, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 99 (2002), pp. 7821--7826, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799.
13.
G. Grazioli, R. W. Martin, and C. T. Butts, Comparative exploratory analysis of intrinsically disordered protein dynamics using machine learning and network analytic methods, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, (June 2019), doi:10.3389/fmolb.2019.00042.
14.
G. Grazioli, Y. Yu, M. H. Unhelkar, R. W. Martin, and C. T. Butts, Network-based classification and modeling of amyloid fibrils, J. Phys. Chem. B, 123 (2019), pp. 5452--5462, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b03494.
15.
M. S. Handcock, D. R. Hunter, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, P. N. Krivitsky, and M. Morris, ERGM: Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks, R package version 3.8.0, The Statnet Project, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ergm, 2019.
16.
M. S. Handcock, D. R. Hunter, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, and M. Morris, Statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data, J. Statist. Software, 24 (2008), pp. 1--11.
17.
T. Hočevar and J. Demšar, Computation of graphlet orbits for nodes and edges in sparse graphs, J. Statist. Software, 71 (2016).
18.
P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt, Transitivity in structural models of small groups, Comparative Group Studies, 2 (1971), pp. 107--124.
19.
D. R. Hunter, Curved exponential family models for social networks, Social Networks, 29 (2007), pp. 216--230.
20.
D. R. Hunter, M. S. Handcock, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, and M. Morris, ERGM: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks, J. Statist. Software, 24 (2008).
21.
D. R. Hunter, P. N. Krivitsky, and M. Schweinberger, Computational statistical methods for social network analysis, J. Comput. Graph. Statist., 21 (2012), pp. 856--882.
22.
D. P. Johnson, Dilemmas of charismatic leadership: The case of the People's Temple, Sociological Analysis, 40 (1979), pp. 315--323.
23.
G. W. Klau and R. Weiskircher, Robustness and resilience, in Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, U. Brandes and T. Erlebach, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005, pp. 417--437.
24.
D. Krackhardt and R. N. Stern, Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation, Social Psychology Quarterly 51 (1988), pp. 123--140.
25.
P. N. Krivitsky, Using contrastive divergence to seed Monte Carlo MLE for exponential-family random graph models, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 107 (2017), pp. 149--161.
26.
E. Lazega, The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership, Oxford University Press on Demand, 2001.
27.
D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, and G. L. Robins, eds., Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894701.
28.
J. L. Moreno and H. H. Jennings, Statistics of social configurations, Sociometry, 1 (1938), pp. 342--374.
29.
M. Morris and M. Kretzschmar, Concurrent Partnerships and the Spread of HIV, AIDS, 11 (1997), pp. 641--648.
30.
M. Morris, A. E. Kurth, D. T. Hamilton, J. Moody, and S. Wakefield, Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: Linking science and public health practice, American J. Public Health, 99 (2009), pp. 1023--1031.
31.
M. E. J. Newman, Modularity and community structure in networks, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 103 (2006), pp. 8577--8582.
32.
P. E. Pattison and G. L. Robins, Neighborhood-based models for social networks, Sociological Methodology, 32 (2002), pp. 301--337.
33.
G. L. Robins, P. E. Pattison, and J. Woolcock, Small and other worlds: Network structures from local processes, American J. Sociology, 110 (2005), pp. 894--936.
34.
T. A. B. Snijders, The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics, Sociological Methodology, 31 (2001), pp. 361--395.
35.
T. A. B. Snijders, Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models, J. Social Structure, 3 (2002).
36.
T. A. B. Snijders, P. E. Pattison, G. L. Robins, and M. S. Handcock, New specifications for exponential random graph models, Sociological Methodology, 36 (2006), pp. 99--154.
37.
D. Strauss and M. Ikeda, Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 85 (1990), pp. 204--212.
38.
D. J. Watts, The “new” science of networks, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 30 (2004), pp. 243--270.
39.
O. N. Yaveroglu, S. M. Fitzhugh, M. Kurant, A. Markopoulou, C. T. Butts, and N. Przulj, ERGM. Graphlets: A Package for ERG Modeling Based on Graphlet Statistics, preprint, arXiv:1405.7348, 2014.
40.
Y. Yu, G. Grazioli, M. H. Unhelkar, R. W. Martin, and C. T. Butts, Network Hamiltonian models reveal pathways to amyloid fibril formation, Scientific Reports, 10 (2020), pp. 1--11.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Pages: 1389 - 1415
ISSN (online): 1095-712X

History

Submitted: 16 September 2019
Accepted: 31 March 2021
Published online: 15 July 2021

Keywords

  1. graph theory
  2. mathematical modeling of graphs
  3. network data
  4. social network analysis
  5. computational sociology
  6. computational biophysics
  7. network Hamiltonian

MSC codes

  1. 05Cxx
  2. 05C62
  3. 68R10
  4. 91D30

Authors

Affiliations

Funding Information

National Science Foundation https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001 : DMS-1361425, SES-1826589

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media