Abstract

This paper considers a utility maximization and optimal asset allocation problem in the presence of a stochastic endowment that cannot be fully hedged through trading in the financial market. After studying continuity properties of the value function for general utility functions, we rely on the dynamic programming approach to solve the optimization problem for power utility investors including the empirically relevant and mathematically challenging case of relative risk aversion larger than one. For this, we argue that the value function is the unique viscosity solution of the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) equation. The homogeneity of the value function is then used to reduce the HJB equation by one dimension, which allows us to prove that the value function is even a classical solution thereof. Using this, an optimal strategy is derived and its asymptotic behavior in the large wealth regime is discussed.

Keywords

  1. utility maximization
  2. Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation
  3. stochastic endowment
  4. viscosity solution

MSC codes

  1. 93E20
  2. 91G80

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
S. A. Azar, Bounds to the coefficient of relative risk aversion, Banking Finance Letters, 2 (2010), pp. 391--398.
2.
R. B. Barsky, F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, and M. D. Shapiro, Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study, Quart. J. Economics, 112 (1997), pp. 537--579.
3.
E. Bayraktar and M. S\^\irbu, Stochastic Perron's method for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, SIAM J. Control Optim., 51 (2013), pp. 4274--4294.
4.
C. Belak, O. Menkens, and J. Sass, On the uniqueness of unbounded viscosity solutions arising in an optimal terminal wealth problem with transaction costs, SIAM J. Control Optim., 53 (2015), pp. 2878--2897.
5.
B. Bick, H. Kraft, and C. Munk, Solving constrained consumption-investment problems by simulation of artificial market strategies, Management Sci., 59 (2013), pp. 483--503.
6.
F. Bosserhoff, A. Chen, N. Sørensen, and M. Stadje, On the investment strategies in occupational pension plans, Quant. Finance, to appear.
7.
D. Broeders and A. Chen, Pension regulation and the market value of pension liabilities: A contingent claims analysis using parisian options, J. Banking Finance, 34 (2010), pp. 1201--1214.
8.
C. Copeland, Target-Date Fund Use in 401(k) Plans and the Persistence of Their Use, 2007-2009, EBRI Issue Brief, 2011.
9.
J. C. Cox and C.-F. Huang, Optimal consumption and portfolio choices when asset prices follow a diffusion process, J. Econom. Theory, 49 (1989), pp. 33--83.
10.
M. G. Crandall, H. Ishii, and P.-L. Lions, User's guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 27 (1992), pp. 1--67.
11.
D. Cuoco, Optimal consumption and equilibrium prices with portfolio constraints and stochastic income, J. Econom. Theory, 72 (1997), pp. 33--73.
12.
J. Cvitanić, W. Schachermayer, and H. Wang, Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment, Finance Stoch., 5 (2001), pp. 259--272.
13.
J. B. Davies, Uncertain lifetime, consumption, and dissaving in retirement, J. Political Economy, 89 (1981), pp. 561--577.
14.
M. H. Davis, Optimal hedging with basis risk, in From Stochastic Calculus to Mathematical Finance, Y. Kabanov, R. Liptser, and J. Stoyanov, eds., Springer, New York, 2006, pp. 169--187.
15.
F. Delbaen and W. Schachermayer, The Mathematics of Arbitrage, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
16.
D. Duffie, W. Fleming, H. M. Soner, and T. Zariphopoulou, Hedging in incomplete markets with HARA utility, J. Econom. Dynam. Control, 21 (1997), pp. 753--782.
17.
P. H. Dybvig and H. Liu, Lifetime consumption and investment: retirement and constrained borrowing, J. Econom. Theory, 145 (2010), pp. 885--907.
18.
N. El Karoui and M. Jeanblanc-Picqué, Optimization of consumption with labor income, Finance Stoch., 2 (1998), pp. 409--440.
19.
S. Federico, P. Gassiat, and F. Gozzi, Utility maximization with current utility on the wealth: Regularity of solutions to the HJB equation, Finance Stoch., 19 (2015), pp. 415--448.
20.
S. Federico, P. Gassiat, and F. Gozzi, Impact of time illiquidity in a mixed market without full observation, Math. Finance, 27 (2017), pp. 401--437.
21.
W. H. Fleming and H. M. Soner, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, Stoch. Model. Appl. Probab. 25, Springer, New York, 2006.
22.
H. He and N. D. Pearson, Consumption and portfolio policies with incomplete markets and short-sale constraints: The finite-dimensional case, Math. Finance, 1 (1991), pp. 1--10.
23.
H. He and N. D. Pearson, Consumption and portfolio policies with incomplete markets and short-sale constraints: The infinite dimensional case, J. Econom. Theory, 54 (1991), pp. 259--304.
24.
U. Horst, Y. Hu, P. Imkeller, A. Réveillac, and J. Zhang, Forward--backward systems for expected utility maximization, Stochastic Process. Appl., 129 (2014), pp. 1813--1848.
25.
Y. Hu, P. Imkeller, and M. Müller, Utility maximization in incomplete markets, Ann. Appl. Probab., 15 (2005), pp. 1691--1712.
26.
J. Hugonnier and D. Kramkov, Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets, Ann. Appl. Probab., 14 (2004), pp. 845--864.
27.
H.-K. Koo, Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income: A continuous time approach, Math. Finance, 8 (1998), pp. 49--65.
28.
N. V. Krylov, Nonlinear Elliptic and Parabolic Equations of the Second Order, Math. Appl. (Soviet Series), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
29.
N. V. Krylov, Controlled Diffusion Processes, Stoch. Model. Appl. Probab. 14, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.
30.
R. Merton, Lifetime portfolio seclection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case, Rev. Econ. Stat., 51 (1969), pp. 247--257.
31.
R. Merton, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous time model, J. Econom. Theory, 3 (1971), pp. 373--413.
32.
R. C. Merton, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, in Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 621--661.
33.
O. Mostovyi, Optimal investment with intermediate consumption and random endowment, Math. Finance, 27 (2017), pp. 96--114.
34.
O. Mostovyi and M. S\^\irbu, Optimal investment and consumption with labor income in incomplete markets, Ann. Appl. Probab., 30 (2020), pp. 747--787.
35.
E. Pardoux and A. Răşcanu, Stochastic Differential Equations, Backward SDEs, Partial Differential Equations, Stoch. Model. Appl. Probab. 69, Springer, Cham, 2014.
36.
H. Pham, Continuous-Time Stochastic Control and Optimization with Financial Applications, Stoch. Model. Appl. Probab. 61, Springer, Berlin, 2009.
37.
S. R. Pliska, A stochastic calculus model of continuous trading: Optimal portfolios, Math. Oper. Res., 11 (1986), pp. 371--382.
38.
M. Soner and M. Vukelja, Utility maximization in an illiquid market in continuous time, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 84 (2016), pp. 285--321.
39.
S. Sundaresan and F. Zapatero, Valuation, optimal asset allocation and retirement incentives of pension plans, Rev. Financial Stud., 10 (1997), pp. 631--660.
40.
N. Touzi, Deterministic and Stochastic Control, Application to Finance, Lecture notes, Université Paris 6, 2012, http://www.cmap.polytechnique.fr/~touzi.
41.
J. Wang and P. A. Forsyth, Maximal use of central differencing for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs in finance, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 46 (2008), pp. 1580--1601.
42.
T. Zariphopoulou, A solution approach to valuation with unhedgeable risks, Finance Stoch., 5 (2001), pp. 61--82.
43.
A. J. Zaslavski, Turnpike Properties in the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control, Nonconvex Optim. Appl., Springer, Boston, 2006.
44.
G. Zitkovic, Stability of the utility maximization problem with random endowment in incomplete markets, Math. Finance, 21 (2011), pp. 313--333.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
Pages: 969 - 1003
ISSN (online): 1945-497X

History

Submitted: 19 October 2021
Accepted: 17 March 2022
Published online: 16 August 2022

Keywords

  1. utility maximization
  2. Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation
  3. stochastic endowment
  4. viscosity solution

MSC codes

  1. 93E20
  2. 91G80

Authors

Affiliations

Funding Information

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited By

There are no citations for this item

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media