Stein Unbiased GrAdient estimator of the Risk (SUGAR) for Multiple Parameter Selection
Abstract
Algorithms for solving variational regularization of ill-posed inverse problems usually involve operators that depend on a collection of continuous parameters. When the operators enjoy some (local) regularity, these parameters can be selected using the so-called Stein Unbiased Risk Estimator (SURE). While this selection is usually performed by an exhaustive search, we address in this work the problem of using the SURE to efficiently optimize for a collection of continuous parameters of the model. When considering nonsmooth regularizers, such as the popular $\ell_1$-norm corresponding to soft-thresholding mapping, the SURE is a discontinuous function of the parameters preventing the use of gradient descent optimization techniques. Instead, we focus on an approximation of the SURE based on finite differences as proposed by Ramani and Unser for the Monte-Carlo SURE approach. Under mild assumptions on the estimation mapping, we show that this approximation is a weakly differentiable function of the parameters and its weak gradient, coined the Stein Unbiased GrAdient estimator of the Risk (SUGAR), provides an asymptotically (with respect to the data dimension) unbiased estimate of the gradient of the risk. Moreover, in the particular case of soft-thresholding, it is proved to also be a consistent estimator. This gradient estimate can then be used as a basis for performing a quasi-Newton optimization. The computation of the SUGAR relies on the closed-form (weak) differentiation of the nonsmooth function. We provide its expression for a large class of iterative methods including proximal splitting methods and apply our strategy to regularizations involving nonsmooth convex structured penalties. Illustrations of various image restoration and matrix completion problems are given.
Keywords
MSC codes
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
H. Attouch and B. F. Svaiter, A continuous dynamical Newton-like approach to solving monotone inclusions, SIAM J. Control Optim., 49 (2011), pp. 574--598.
2.
H. Avron and S. Toledo, Randomized algorithms for estimating the trace of an implicit symmetric positive semi-definite matrix, J. ACM, 58 (2011), 8.
3.
H. Bauschke and P. L. Combettes, Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, CMS Books Math./Ouvrages Math. SMC, Springer, New York, 2011.
4.
A. Benazza-Benyahia and J.-C. Pesquet, Building robust wavelet estimators for multicomponent images using Stein's principle, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 14 (2005), pp. 1814--1830.
5.
J. Bennett and S. Lanning, The Netflix prize, in Proceedings of KDD Cup and Workshop 2007, ACM, New York, 2007, pp. 3--6.
6.
T. Blu and F. Luisier, The SURE-LET approach to image denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 16 (2007), pp. 2778--2786.
7.
T. T. Cai and H. H. Zhou, A data-driven block thresholding approach to wavelet estimation, Ann. Statist., 37 (2009), pp. 569--595.
8.
E. J. Candès and B. Recht, Exact matrix completion via convex optimization, Found. Comput. Math., 9 (2009), pp. 717--772.
9.
E. J. Candès, C. A. Sing-Long, and J. D. Trzasko, Unbiased risk estimates for singular value thresholding and spectral estimators, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 61 (2013), pp. 4643--4657.
10.
A. Chambolle and T. Pock, A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 40 (2011), pp. 120--145.
11.
C. Chaux, L. Duval, A. Benazza-Benyahia, and J.-C. Pesquet, A nonlinear Stein-based estimator for multichannel image denoising, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 56 (2008), pp. 3855--3870.
12.
P. L. Combettes and J.-C. Pesquet, A Douglas-Rachford splitting approach to nonsmooth convex variational signal recovery, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., 1 (2007), pp. 564--574.
13.
P. L. Combettes and J.-C. Pesquet, Proximal splitting methods in signal processing, in Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, Springer, New York, 2011, pp. 185--212.
14.
P. L. Combettes and V. R. Wajs, Signal recovery by proximal forward-backward splitting, Multiscale Model. Simul., 4 (2005), pp. 1168--1200.
15.
I. Daubechies, Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 41 (1988), pp. 909--996.
16.
C.-A. Deledalle, V. Duval, and J. Salmon, Non-local methods with shape-adaptive patches (NLM-SAP), J. Math. Imaging Vision, 43 (2012), pp. 103--120.
17.
C.-A. Deledalle, G. Peyré, and J. Fadili, Stein COnsistent Risk Estimator (SCORE) for Hard Thresholding, preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5874arXiv:1301.5874v1 [math.ST], 2013.
18.
C.-A. Deledalle, F. Tupin, and L. Denis, Poisson NL means: Unsupervised non local means for Poisson noise, in Proceedings of the 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2010, pp. 801--804.
19.
C.-A. Deledalle, S. Vaiter, G. Peyré, J. Fadili, and C. Dossal, Proximal splitting derivatives for risk estimation, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 386 (2012), 012003.
20.
C.-A. Deledalle, S. Vaiter, G. Peyré, J. Fadili, and C. Dossal, Risk Estimation for Matrix Recovery with Spectral Regularization, preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1482arXiv:1205.1482v3 [math.OC], 2012.
21.
C.-A. Deledalle, S. Vaiter, G. Peyré, J. Fadili, and C. Dossal, Unbiased risk estimation for sparse analysis regularization, in Proceedings of the 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2012, pp. 3053--3056.
22.
S. J. Dong and K. F. Liu, Stochastic estimation with $Z_2$ noise, Phys. Lett. B, 328 (1994), pp. 130--136.
23.
D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 90 (1995), pp. 1200--1224.
24.
C. Dossal, M. Kachour, M. J. Fadili, G. Peyré, and C. Chesneau, The degrees of freedom of the lasso for general design matrix, Statist. Sinica, 23 (2013), pp. 809--828.
25.
V. Duval, J.-F. Aujol, and Y. Gousseau, A bias-variance approach for the nonlocal means, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 4 (2011), pp. 760--788.
26.
A. Edelman, Jacobians of Matrix Transforms (with Wedge Products), Handout 3, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
27.
B. Efron, How biased is the apparent error rate of a prediction rule?, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 81 (1986), pp. 461--470.
28.
Y. C. Eldar, Generalized SURE for exponential families: Applications to regularization, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 57 (2009), pp. 471--481.
29.
L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy, Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992.
30.
M. Fazel, Matrix Rank Minimization with Applications, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2002.
31.
D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Classics Math. 517, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
32.
D. A. Girard, A fast “Monte Carlo cross-validation” procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data, Numer. Math., 56 (1989), pp. 1--23.
33.
R. Giryes, M. Elad, and Y. C. Eldar, The projected GSURE for automatic parameter tuning in iterative shrinkage methods, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 30 (2011), pp. 407--422.
34.
G. H. Golub, M. Heath, and G. Wahba, Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter, Technometrics, 21 (1979), pp. 215--223.
35.
A. Griewank and A. Walther, Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008.
36.
J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty and C. Lemaréchal, Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms, Vols. I--II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
37.
H. M. Hudson, A natural identity for exponential families with applications in multiparameter estimation, Ann. Statist., 6 (1978), pp. 473--484.
38.
H. M. Hudson and T. Lee, Maximum likelihood restoration and choice of smoothing parameter in deconvolution of image data subject to Poisson noise, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 26 (1998), pp. 393--410.
39.
M. F. Hutchinson, A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix for Laplacian smoothing splines, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 18 (1989), pp. 1059--1076.
40.
K. Kato, On the degrees of freedom in shrinkage estimation, J. Multivariate Anal., 100 (2009), pp. 1338--1352.
41.
N. Komodakis and J.-C. Pesquet, Playing with Duality: An Overview of Recent Primal-Dual Approaches for Solving Large-Scale Optimization Problems, preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5429arXiv:1406.5429v1 [cs.NA], 2014.
42.
A. S. Lewis and M. L. Overton, Nonsmooth optimization via quasi-Newton methods, Math. Program., 141 (2013), pp. 135--163.
43.
A. S. Lewis and H. S. Sendov, Twice differentiable spectral functions, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 23 (2001), pp. 368--386.
44.
K.-C. Li, From Stein's unbiased risk estimates to the method of generalized cross validation, Ann. Statist., 13 (1985), pp. 1352--1377.
45.
F. Luisier, T. Blu, and M. Unser, SURE-LET for orthonormal wavelet-domain video denoising, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 20 (2010), pp. 913--919.
46.
S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. The Sparse Way, 3rd ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2009.
47.
U. Naumann, Optimal Jacobian accumulation is NP-complete, Math. Program., 112 (2008), pp. 427--441.
48.
J.-C. Pesquet, A. Benazza-Benyahia, and C. Chaux, A SURE approach for digital signal/image deconvolution problems, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 57 (2009), pp. 4616--4632.
49.
J.-C. Pesquet and D. Leporini, A new wavelet estimator for image denoising, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Image Processing and Its Applications, IET, Stevenage, UK, 1997, pp. 249--253.
50.
H. Raguet, J. Fadili, and G. Peyré, A generalized forward-backward splitting, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 6 (2013), pp. 1199--1226.
51.
S. Ramani, T. Blu, and M. Unser, Monte-Carlo SURE: A black-box optimization of regularization parameters for general denoising algorithms, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 17 (2008), pp. 1540--1554.
52.
S. Ramani, Z. Liu, J. Rosen, J.-F. Nielsen, and J. A. Fessler, Regularization parameter selection for nonlinear iterative image restoration and MRI reconstruction using GCV and SURE-based methods, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21 (2012), pp. 3659--3672.
53.
S. Ramani, J. Rosen, Z. Liu, and J. A. Fessler, Iterative weighted risk estimation for nonlinear image restoration with analysis priors, in Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 8296, Computational Imaging X, SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2012, 82960N.
54.
M. Raphan and E. P. Simoncelli, Optimal denoising in redundant representations, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 17 (2008), pp. 1342--1352.
55.
M. Raphan and E. P. Simoncelli, Least squares estimation without priors or supervision, Neural Comput., 23 (2011), pp. 374--420.
56.
J. Rice, Choice of smoothing parameter in deconvolution problems, Contemp. Math., 59 (1986), pp. 137--151.
57.
R. T. Rockafellar, Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm, SIAM J. Control Optim., 14 (1976), pp. 877--898.
58.
F. Roosta-Khorasani and U. Ascher, Improved Bounds on Sample Size for Implicit Matrix Trace Estimators, preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2475arXiv:1308.2475 [cs.NA], 2013.
59.
L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D, 60 (1992), pp. 259--268.
60.
X. Shen and J. Ye, Adaptive model selection, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 97 (2002), pp. 210--221.
61.
V. Solo and M. Ulfarsson, Threshold selection for group sparsity, in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2010, pp. 3754--3757.
62.
C. M. Stein, Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution, Ann. Statist., 9 (1981), pp. 1135--1151.
63.
D. Sun and J. Sun, Nonsmooth Matrix Valued Functions Defined by Singular Values, Technical report, Department of Decision Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2003.
64.
R. J. Tibshirani and J. Taylor, The solution path of the generalized lasso, Ann. Statist., 39 (2011), pp. 1335--1371.
65.
R. J. Tibshirani and J. Taylor, Degrees of freedom in lasso problems, Ann. Statist., 40 (2012), pp. 1198--1232.
66.
S. Vaiter, C.-A. Deledalle, G. Peyré, C. Dossal, and J. Fadili, Local behavior of sparse analysis regularization: Applications to risk estimation, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 35 (2013), pp. 433--451.
67.
S. Vaiter, C.-A. Deledalle, G. Peyré, J. M Fadili, and C. Dossal, The Degrees of Freedom of Partly Smooth Regularizers, preprint, arXiv:1404.5557v2 [math.ST], 2014.
68.
D. Van De Ville and M. Kocher, SURE-based non-local means, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 16 (2009), pp. 973--976.
69.
D. Van De Ville and M. Kocher, Non-local means with dimensionality reduction and SURE-based parameter selection, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9 (2011), pp. 2683--2690.
70.
C. Vonesch, S. Ramani, and M. Unser, Recursive risk estimation for non-linear image deconvolution with a wavelet-domain sparsity constraint, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2008, pp. 665--668.
71.
J. Ye, On measuring and correcting the effects of data mining and model selection, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 93 (1998), pp. 120--131.
72.
M. Yuan and Y. Lin, Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 68 (2006), pp. 49--67.
73.
H. Zou, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, On the “degrees of freedom” of the lasso, Ann. Statist., 35 (2007), pp. 2173--2192.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
History
Submitted: 6 May 2014
Accepted: 19 August 2014
Published online: 25 November 2014
Keywords
MSC codes
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited By
- On learning the optimal regularization parameter in inverse problemsInverse Problems, Vol. 40, No. 12 | 4 November 2024
- Weighted Singular Value Thresholding and Gradient Optimization of Unbiased Risk Estimate for Rank Estimation in Automatic Music Transcription2024 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM) | 21 Aug 2024
- Iterative regularization for low complexity regularizersNumerische Mathematik, Vol. 156, No. 2 | 10 February 2024
- On the Determination of Lagrange Multipliers for a Weighted LASSO Problem Using Geometric and Convex Analysis TechniquesApplied Mathematics & Optimization, Vol. 89, No. 2 | 17 January 2024
- Automatic Tuning of Denoising Algorithms Parameters Without Ground TruthIEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 31 | 1 Jan 2024
- An in–vivo validation of ESI methods with focal sourcesNeuroImage, Vol. 277 | 1 Aug 2023
- Fast and Efficient Local-Search for Genetic Programming Based Loss Function LearningProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference | 12 July 2023
- Hyperparameter selection for Discrete Mumford–ShahSignal, Image and Video Processing, Vol. 17, No. 5 | 16 December 2022
- Compressed sensing with ℓ 0 -norm: statistical physics analysis & algorithms for signal recovery2023 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW) | 23 Apr 2023
- Learning Symbolic Model-Agnostic Loss Functions via Meta-LearningIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. abs 1803 2999 | 1 Jan 2023
- Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision From a Unified Perspective: A Survey and BeyondIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 44, No. 12 | 1 Dec 2022
- Convergence of a Piggyback-Style Method for the Differentiation of Solutions of Standard Saddle-Point ProblemsSIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, Vol. 4, No. 3 | 14 July 2022
- Selecting Regularization Parameters for Nuclear Norm--Type Minimization ProblemsSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 44, No. 4 | 1 August 2022
- An off-the-grid approach to multi-compartment magnetic resonance fingerprintingInverse Problems, Vol. 38, No. 8 | 15 June 2022
- Low-rank matrix denoising for count data using unbiased Kullback-Leibler risk estimationComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 169 | 1 May 2022
- Alternative Design of DeepPDNet in the Context of Image RestorationIEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 29 | 1 Jan 2022
- Fast Scalable Image Restoration Using Total Variation Priors and Expectation PropagationIEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 31 | 1 Jan 2022
- On an unsupervised method for parameter selection for the elastic netMathematics in Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 6 | 1 Jan 2022
- A parallel spatial and Bloch manifold regularized iterative reconstruction method for MR FingerprintingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 82 | 1 Oct 2021
- Automated Data-Driven Selection of the Hyperparameters for Total-Variation-Based Texture SegmentationJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 63, No. 7 | 29 May 2021
- RHAPSODIE: Reconstruction of High-contrAst Polarized SOurces and Deconvolution for cIrcumstellar EnvironmentsAstronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 653 | 24 September 2021
- Convergence of proximal gradient algorithm in the presence of adjoint mismatch *Inverse Problems, Vol. 37, No. 6 | 17 June 2021
- Predictive risk estimation for the expectation maximization algorithm with Poisson dataInverse Problems, Vol. 37, No. 4 | 17 March 2021
- A Deep Primal-Dual Proximal Network for Image RestorationIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Vol. 15, No. 2 | 1 Feb 2021
- Parametric PSF estimation based on recursive SURE for sparse deconvolutionJournal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems, Vol. 29, No. 1 | 1 September 2020
- Accelerated Iterative Regularization via Dual Diagonal DescentSIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 31, No. 1 | 1 March 2021
- Parameter-free and fast nonlinear piecewise filtering: application to experimental physicsAnnals of Telecommunications, Vol. 75, No. 11-12 | 29 October 2020
- Convergence of regularization methods with filter functions for a regularization parameter chosen with GSURE and mildly ill-posed inverse problemsJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 378 | 1 Nov 2020
- An Approximate Message Passing Algorithm For Rapid Parameter-Free Compressed Sensing MRI2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) | 1 Oct 2020
- Deep learning for a space-variant deconvolution in galaxy surveysAstronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 641 | 11 September 2020
- A parameter choice rule for Tikhonov regularization based on predictive riskInverse Problems, Vol. 36, No. 6 | 5 June 2020
- Deep unfolding of a proximal interior point method for image restorationInverse Problems, Vol. 36, No. 3 | 12 February 2020
- Convergence of regularization methods with filter functions for a regularization parameter chosen with GSUREJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1476, No. 1 | 1 Mar 2020
- Use of PALM for ℓ1 sparse matrix factorization: Difficulty and rationalization of a two-step approachDigital Signal Processing, Vol. 97 | 1 Feb 2020
- Empirical risk minimization as parameter choice rule for general linear regularization methodsAnnales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, Vol. 56, No. 1 | 1 Feb 2020
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Regularization Parameters in High-Dimensional Inverse Problems: An Empirical Bayesian Approach Part I: Methodology and ExperimentsSIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 4 | 18 November 2020
- A Bi-Level Nested Sparse Optimization for Adaptive Mechanical Fault Feature DetectionIEEE Access, Vol. 8 | 1 Jan 2020
- A Blind Multiscale Spatial Regularization Framework for Kernel-Based Spectral UnmixingIEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 29 | 1 Jan 2020
- A parallel and automatically tuned algorithm for multispectral image deconvolutionMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, No. 1 | 9 August 2019
- A discrete dynamics approach to sparse calculation and applied in ontology scienceJournal of Difference Equations and Applications, Vol. 25, No. 9-10 | 27 November 2018
- Nonlinear denoising for characterization of solid friction under low confinement pressurePhysical Review E, Vol. 100, No. 3 | 17 September 2019
- An Iterative Sure-Let Deconvolution Algorithm Based on BM3D Denoiser2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) | 1 Sep 2019
- Learned Image Deblurring by Unfolding a Proximal Interior Point Algorithm2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) | 1 Sep 2019
- Quantifying Uncertainty in High Dimensional Inverse Problems by Convex Optimisation2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) | 1 Sep 2019
- Projection onto Epigraph Sets for Rapid Self-Tuning Compressed Sensing MRIIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 38, No. 7 | 1 Jul 2019
- Training Deep Learning Based Image Denoisers From Undersampled Measurements Without Ground Truth and Without Image Prior2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) | 1 Jun 2019
- Joint Reconstruction of Multitemporal or Multispectral Single-Photon 3D LiDAR Images2019 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence Conference (SSPD) | 1 May 2019
- Generating structured nonsmooth priors and associated primal-dual methodsProcessing, Analyzing and Learning of Images, Shapes, and Forms: Part 2 | 1 Jan 2019
- Revisiting sparse ICA from a synthesis point of view: Blind Source Separation for over and underdetermined mixturesSignal Processing, Vol. 152 | 1 Nov 2018
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Regularisation Parameters2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) | 1 Oct 2018
- Decomposition of Dynamical Signals into Jumps, Oscillatory Patterns, and Possible OutliersMathematics, Vol. 6, No. 7 | 16 July 2018
- ADA-PT: An Adaptive Parameter Tuning Strategy Based on the Weighted Stein Unbiased Risk Estimator2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) | 1 Apr 2018
- Iterative Regularization via Dual Diagonal DescentJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 60, No. 2 | 1 August 2017
- Investigating the Influence of Box-Constraints on the Solution of a Total Variation Model via an Efficient Primal-Dual MethodJournal of Imaging, Vol. 4, No. 1 | 6 January 2018
- A Variational Bayesian Approach for Image Restoration—Application to Image Deblurring With Poisson–Gaussian NoiseIEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, Vol. 3, No. 4 | 1 Dec 2017
- Optimal Selection of the Regularization Function in a Weighted Total Variation Model. Part II: Algorithm, Its Analysis and Numerical TestsJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 59, No. 3 | 9 June 2017
- The degrees of freedom of partly smooth regularizersAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Vol. 69, No. 4 | 25 May 2016
- Automated Parameter Selection for Total Variation Minimization in Image RestorationJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 57, No. 2 | 22 July 2016
- CLEAR: Covariant LEAst-Square Refitting with Applications to Image RestorationSIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 1 | 2 March 2017
- Estimation of Kullback-Leibler losses for noisy recovery problems within the exponential familyElectronic Journal of Statistics, Vol. 11, No. 2 | 1 Jan 2017
- A Sparse Reconstruction Framework for Fourier-Based Plane-Wave ImagingIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Vol. 63, No. 12 | 1 Dec 2016
- Techniques for Gradient-Based Bilevel Optimization with Non-smooth Lower Level ProblemsJournal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 56, No. 2 | 17 May 2016
- Comparing Bayesian models in the absence of ground truth2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) | 1 Aug 2016
- Fast variational Bayesian signal recovery in the presence of Poisson-Gaussian noise2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) | 1 Mar 2016
- Wavelet‐Based Image Deconvolution and ReconstructionWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering | 15 February 2016
- Wasserstein Loss for Image Synthesis and RestorationSIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4 | 26 October 2016
- Parameter estimation for L<inf>P</inf> regularized image deconvolution2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) | 1 Sep 2015
- Maximum-a-posteriori estimation with unknown regularisation parameters2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) | 1 Aug 2015
- On Debiasing Restoration Algorithms: Applications to Total-Variation and Nonlocal-MeansScale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision | 28 April 2015
- Bilevel Optimization with Nonsmooth Lower Level ProblemsScale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision | 28 April 2015
- Iterative choice of the optimal regularization parameter in TV image restorationInverse Problems & Imaging, Vol. 9, No. 4 | 1 Jan 2015
View Options
- Access via your Institution
- Questions about how to access this content? Contact SIAM at [email protected].