Search
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation

SIAM Review (SIREV) depends heavily on our referees, and we are greatly indebted to you for maintaining the quality and timeliness of our journal. Thank you for your help in assessing manuscripts.

Review Process

The manuscript submission and peer review process is broken down into the following steps:

  1. The author submits a manuscript.
  2. The section editor assigns an associate editor to act as review editor for the paper.
  3. The associate editor assigns referees.
  4. The referees review the manuscript and send reports.
  5. The associate editor makes a decision and the author is contacted.

Navigating the System

All SIREV papers go through review in the web-based Journal Submission & Tracking System.

When invited to serve as a referee there are two ways to gain access to the manuscript.

  1. You'll receive email with basic information about the paper and a link that takes you to the manuscript. From this webpage, you can also accept or decline the assignment. 
    1. Accept referee assignment: If you accept, the link will automatically log you into the system and take you directly to the files for the pertinent paper.
    2. Decline referee assignment: If you are unable to review this manuscript and must decline we appreciate any suggestions of potential referees. You can suggest other reviewers or offer any observation on the paper by email.
  2. You can alternately access your files by logging into the system located here. Enter your user name and password. You are then taken to your "Home" page. It will list your assignment via a manuscript link. After clicking this link, you will be presented with a screen containing:
    1. Information about the specific manuscript and the paper in PDF format.
    2. Links to Accept/Decline to serve as a referee.
    3. A link to contact journal staff.

Review Manuscript

Once in the system you will be presented with a "Manuscript" screen. At the bottom of this screen under "Manuscript Tasks" is a "Review Manuscript" link. Clicking on this link displays the "Review Manuscript" screen. This screen asks for a recommendation and for a report.

Note that in giving a recommendation, along with a free-form text box that allows you to copy and paste a report and /or comments, you must:

Select from a drop-down menu. This manuscript is:

  • Excellent
  • Good
  • Fair
  • Poor
  • Not appropriate for the journal

Select from a drop-down menu. I recommend:

  • Reject outright
  • Return to the author for major revisions, outlined in comments
  • Publish after minor revisions, outlined in comments
  • Publish as is
 
 

Other Notes

Text Box for Reports

If you prefer to work offline, you may find it faster and easier to download and print the manuscript, draft your review remarks in plain text or TeX, and copy and paste into the referee remarks text area on this screen.

NOTE: As a referee, SIREV offers the option of attaching a file to deliver your report. It is recommended, however, that you instead use the text box on the Referee Recommendation Screen to type or paste plain text or TeX code. PDF and Word file attachments sometimes contain hidden information that reveal your identity. If you must send an attachment know that it may be forwarded to the author by the review editor, so please be sure to first edit the file for profile information that, if left in place, could disclose your identity as the owner/creator. See more information on finding and removing identity clues in referee reports.

Private Note to Editors

There is also a text box available if you wish to include a private message to the editor. Comments entered here are not meant to be seen by the author(s).

Supplementary Materials

SIREV authors are encouraged to submit Supplementary Materials to complement articles. They might include additional figures or examples, animations, data sets used in the paper, computer code used to generate figures or tables, or other materials that are necessary to fully document the research contained in the paper or to facilitate the readers' ability to understand and extend the work.

If you are refereeing a paper that does include Supplementary Materials, along with the manuscript, know that the Supplementary Materials are generally not refereed but are available to you, as a referee. As part of your review you are asked to give the materials at least a cursory look and verify that they are appropriate to accompany the article. You may suggest changes, including removing some extraneous Supplementary Materials or moving items from the main text to the Supplementary Materials.

The author is also asked to submit an index of the supplementary materials. You should find a listing of each item along with a brief description and a justification for why the item should be included. This should be helpful in judging the appropriateness of the materials. Read more for the full guidelines on the journal's Supplementary Materials policy.

Getting Help

If you need additional help, you can click on the help signs throughout the system. A help dialog will pop up with context sensitive help. You can also contact SIAM for further assistance.

Author Rights to Unpublished Manuscripts

All manuscripts are privileged documents; an author retains the right to the unpublished work. A referee should not use results or ideas obtained exclusively through the refereeing process in his or her own research.